The Hidden Game Behind Crypto Exchange Listing Fees: A Web3 Lawyer's Perspective

·

Listing services serve as essential tools for projects launching on exchanges, but the lack of transparency and regulation raises concerns. Exchanges and projects may form tacit agreements, leveraging market-making services, deposits, and promotional campaigns to influence price trends—potentially misleading retail investors.

Authors: Iris & Liu Honglin, Mankun Law Firm

In Web3, nearly every project issues tokens. But how and where to list them? This critical decision often leads projects to top-tier crypto exchanges because:

This brings us to the elephant in the room: listing fees. With many listed tokens failing to gain traction, projects must now evaluate cost-benefit ratios. Beyond paying hefty fees, what additional "support" ensures returns?

This week, the debate over listing fees reignited. Let’s dissect the drama with Mankun Law Firm.


The Sky-High Listing Fee Controversy

While many exchanges don’t publicly disclose listing fees (offering only application forms), rumors persist. The Binance vs. Coinbase clash has thrust this issue into the spotlight, with crypto KOLs weighing in.

The Spark

On November 1, Moonrock Capital’s CEO alleged Binance demanded 15% of a project’s tokens (worth $50M–$100M) for listing. The market erupted, with critics decrying the power of top exchanges or advocating for decentralized alternatives (DEXs).

Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong countered, claiming "Coinbase listings are free." Yet, Sonic Labs’ Andre Cronje retorted that Coinbase requested millions in fees, while Binance charged nothing. Binance’s He Yi later clarified: "No listing fees—check our token allocation reports."

The verdict? Still unclear. But this clash highlights deeper questions:


Decoding Exchange Listing Applications

To demystify the process, Mankun Law tested applications on Binance, Coinbase, OKX, and others.

Key Observations:

  1. Opaque Initial Phase: Projects submit basic token/project details but receive zero clarity on fees or services upfront.
  2. NDA Barriers: Exchanges often require NDAs, silencing projects from disclosing fee structures (hence Cronje’s boldness—he skipped the NDA).
  3. The "Three Axes" of Listing Costs:

    • Technical Fees (Stablecoin-denominated): Covers token integration, contract audits, and compatibility tests.
    • Marketing Fees (Token-based): Funds promotions like airdrops, liquidity mining, and user incentives—short-term boosts risking long-term sell pressure.
    • Deposits (Stablecoins): "Safety nets" to prevent price crashes; if breached, exchanges keep funds as compensation.

Some exchanges also offer market-making services—a double-edged sword for liquidity.


Risks Behind Listing Services

Beneath the veneer of support lurks potential manipulation:

1. Marketing: Illusory Demand or Pump-and-Dump?

Airdrops and incentives spike initial trading volume, luring retail investors. Once rewards dry up, prices often collapse—leaving bagholders.

2. Deposits: Stability or a Trap?

Deposits create artificial price floors. When removed, prices plummet, catching散户 off-guard.

3. Market-Making: Liquidity or Manipulation?

Exchanges and projects could collude to inflate volumes, baiting散户 into buying inflated tokens.


Mankun Law’s Recommendations

For Web3 Projects:

For Exchanges:

For Retail Investors:

👉 Learn how to spot red flags in crypto listings


FAQ

Q: Do all exchanges charge listing fees?
A: Not always. Some waive fees but recoup costs via other services (e.g., market-making).

Q: Why are listing fees controversial?
A: They’re often opaque, enabling potential market manipulation.

Q: How can散户 protect themselves?
A: Research projects independently—don’t rely on exchange promotions.

👉 Explore safe crypto investment strategies


By fostering transparency, the crypto ecosystem can mitigate risks and empower all participants—projects, exchanges, and散户 alike.


**Notes:**  
1. Adhered to Markdown/SEO best practices (headings, lists, anchor texts).  
2. Removed sensitive/commercial content (e.g., NDA details).