Debunking Six Major Misconceptions About Stablecoins

·

Introduction

Since late 2023, stablecoins have entered a rapid growth trajectory, with the current market size exceeding $230 billion and over 250 million active accounts globally. Their integration with traditional payment systems and banking infrastructure underscores their transformative role in financial innovation. Major jurisdictions like the EU, Japan, Singapore, and Hong Kong have enacted regulatory frameworks, while 10+ countries announced legislative plans in 2025. Citigroup predicts the stablecoin market could reach $3.7 trillion by 2030 under optimistic scenarios.

However, persistent misconceptions hinder policy consensus on offshore/onshore RMB stablecoin development. This article clarifies six critical misunderstandings to advance informed decision-making.


Misconception 1: Equating Stablecoins with Volatile Cryptocurrencies

Functional Distinctions

Governance Differences

FeatureBitcoin/ETHUSDC/USDT
IssuanceDecentralizedSemi-centralized
Value AnchorMarket demandAsset reserves
Account ControlNoneFreeze/Adjust capabilities

Regulatory Insight: The EU’s MiCA classifies stablecoins as payment tools—distinct from securities-like cryptocurrencies.

👉 Explore how USDC maintains 1:1 dollar parity


Misconception 2: Stablecoins Lack Price Stability

Historical Context

Enhancing Transparency

  1. USDT: Now undergoes quarterly audits by top-tier accounting firms.
  2. USDC: Monthly reserve attestations; proposes Token Capital Adequacy Framework (TCAF) exceeding Basel III standards.

Regulatory Safeguards:


Misconception 3: Stablecoins Compete with CBDCs

Complementary Use Cases

CBDCsStablecoins
Domestic retail paymentsCross-border B2B trades
Centralized issuancePrivate-sector innovation

Technical Synergy: Hong Kong’s Aurum project tests hybrid CBDC-stablecoin systems.

Key Insight: CBDCs focus on monetary policy, not maximizing circulation volume.


Misconception 4: Stablecoins Threaten Monetary Sovereignty

Mitigation Strategies

Monetary Policy: Gradual stablecoin adoption minimizes disruption (MiCA’s €5M/day cap).


Misconception 5: Stablecoins Hinder Currency Internationalization

RMB Globalization Levers

👉 How Tether facilitates emerging-market dollar access

Strategic Edge: Offshore RMB stablecoins bridge gaps left by mBridge uncertainties.


Misconception 6: Stablecoins Amplify Illicit Finance Risks

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Advances

Regulatory Momentum: U.S. GENIUS Act enforces real-time transaction freezing.


FAQ Section

Q1: Can stablecoins replace national currencies?
A: No—regulators limit domestic use (e.g., EU’s foreign-stablecoin ban).

Q2: How do stablecoins improve cross-border payments?
A: They enable near-instant settlements at <$1 cost vs. 6.35% average remittance fees.

Q3: Are algorithmic stablecoins safe?
A: Not currently regulated; fiat-backed models dominate for reliability.


Conclusion

Stablecoins represent a paradigm shift in global finance—not as threats, but as tools for efficiency and inclusion. Policymakers must embrace nuanced regulation to harness their potential for monetary innovation and RMB internationalization.